I'll also go with being in the not very concerned about them being literally independent as much as I am with them not being owned by the handful of monstrosities eating the industry and offering me a way to ski a reasonable amount at a fair price, at places I like.
NewEnglandSkier13;c-59856 wroteBut Pacific is one of the conglomerates.
I think there is a big difference between 6 and 41.
Especially when they're mostly mid-tier places quite literally scattered across the continent and don't have a lot of power created by their being a conglomerate. Owning 6 ski areas in VT would be a very different position in terms of their power in the market, for example.